Ane Mintegi Del Olmo vs Cagla Buyukakcay Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 12:11 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Mintegi Del Olmo vs C. Buyukakcay

 ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Olmo 1 - 0 Buyukakcay
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ane Mintegi Del Olmo winning 2 and Cagla Buyukakcay winning 0. The last match between Ane Mintegi Del Olmo and Cagla Buyukakcay was at the W50 Aschaffenburg, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ane Mintegi Del Olmo getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Olmo | 1 | 
| Buyukakcay | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Aschaffenburg(07-09-25)
A. M. D. Olmo vs C. Buyukakcay H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $548,412 | 
| 63.87% (99-56) | Career Total W/L | 54.61% (574-477) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 4 | Titles | 13 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
A. M. D. Olmo vs C. Buyukakcay Match Preview:
- When it comes to second serve success over the past six months, both players show similar percentages: Olmo at 36.52% and Buyukakcay at 36.27%. Could this indicate a slight edge for Olmo?
 - Regarding return games, Olmo demonstrates superior performance, winning 55.38% of second serve return points compared to Buyukakcay’s 48.88%. For first serve return points, Olmo also leads with 39.56% versus Buyukakcay's 38.66%.
 - Both players have closely matched breakpoint save percentages: Olmo at 45.18% and Buyukakcay at 45.06%, suggesting they handle pressure comparably.
 - Overall match wins in the past year show Olmo at a 70% success rate, outpacing Buyukakcay who stands at 55.38%.
 - Surface preferences reveal Olmo's highest success on clay (65%), while Buyukakcay excels on indoor hard courts (57%).
 - Assessing competition quality, Olmo's opponents have an average rank of 272.93, whereas Buyukakcay faces those ranked around 391.91 on average.
 - In deciding sets, Olmo has shown stronger results, winning 75% compared to Buyukakcay's 61% over the past year.
 - Olmo demonstrates more effective breakpoint conversion recently, at 46.32% versus Buyukakcay's 33.5%.
 
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
Both players have similar second serve success rates, but Olmo seems to have a slight advantage. This is crucial in determining who might control longer rallies.
Olmo's superior performance in return games highlights their potential to break Buyukakcay’s serve more often, which could be pivotal in tight sets.
Their ability to handle pressure is evenly matched, but Olmo's overall match consistency over the past year, coupled with higher quality of opposition faced, suggests a robust competitive edge.
The stats reveal Olmo’s proficiency when the match goes to a deciding set, which is crucial for potential game-changers during play.
Overall, factoring in all statistical edges, Olmo appears more likely to secure a victory in this upcoming match.
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo vs Cagla Buyukakcay Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. M. D. Olmo vs C. Buyukakcay H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 7 | 
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 | 
| 1:40:36 | Average Match Time | 1:40:36 | 
| 75% (53/71) | 1st Serve % | 68% (38/56) | 
| 49% (26/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (16/38) | 
| 44% (8/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) | 
| 64% (7/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) | 
| 61% (34/56) | Return Points Win % | 52% (37/71) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
A. M. D. Olmo Recent Matches Played
C. Buyukakcay Recent Matches Played

A. M. D. Olmo vs C. Buyukakcay Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.87% (99/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.67% (574/476) | 
| 61.10% (212/135) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.05% (1307/1111) | 
| 55.22% (1739/1410) | Games Win/Loss | 51.98% (11507/10632) | 
| 53.33% (16/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.47% (218/175) | 
| 66.40% (83/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.97% (249/204) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.50% (100/77) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.93% (7/20) | 
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 | 
| 70 | Aces Total | 272 | 
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 | 
| 500 | Total Double Faults | 1617 | 
| 1:26:12 | Average Match Time | 1:5:33 | 
| 461.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 553.01 | 
| 69% (5609/8128) | 1st Serve % | 72% (31673/43820) | 
| 58% (3230/5609) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (18198/31673) | 
| 42% (1064/2519) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5310/12144) | 
| 51% (619/1225) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2817/5894) | 
| 50% (4125/8256) | Return Points Win % | 47% (20750/43980) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 38.71% (24/38) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 20.00% (3/12) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (14/14) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 36.21% (42/74) | 
| 64.75% (79/43) | Challenger W/L | 58.77% (429/301) | 
| 62.50% (20/12) | Futures W/L | 62.63% (62/37) | 
| 66% (98/148) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (565/1041) | 
| 52% (12/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (106/223) | 
| 67% (30/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (159/328) | 
| 90% (97/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (550/483) | 
| 10% (97/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (550/67) | 
| 22% (58/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (499/89) |